Implementation strategy to reduce environmental impact
of energy related activities in Zimbabwe
Working Paper No. 5
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment
Risų National Laboratory, Denmark
January 1997
Southern Centre for Energy and Environment
Zimbabwe
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
India
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment
Denmark
Southern Centre for Energy and Environment
31 Frank Johnson Ave., Eastlea
P.O. Box CY 1074, Causeway
Harare
Zimbabwe
phone/fax: +263 4 737351/739341
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
Nehru Marg
Nagpur-440 020
India
phone: +91 0712 226071 to 226075
fax: +91 0712 226252
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment
Risų National Laboratory
P.O. Box 49
DK-4000 Roskilde
Denmark
phone: +45 46 32 22 88
fax: +45 46 32 19 99
Contents
2 Background on the energy sector in Zimbabwe
3 Environmental impacts of energy related activities
4 Review of studies on energy efficiency in Zimbabwe
5 Barriers to implementation of negative cost options in Zimbabwe
6 Proposed implementation strategies
7 Role of multi-lateral and bi-lateral institutions/agencies in technology transfer and diffusion 63
Annex I: Evaluation of select combustion technologies
Annex II: NOx emissions from different combustion technologies
Annex III: Air pollutants from various electricity-generating technologies
Annex VI: NOx control technologies
Zimbabwe's economy has sizeable commercial agriculture, manufacturing and mining
activities. Energy consumption is relatively high by regional standards. The country has
substantial coal reserves. All petroleum products are imported. Wood fuels are widely used
by the rural households and by low income urban households as the main source of household
energy.
In view of a current economic reform programme which has opened the local market to
foreign finished products and looks to an export led economic expansion strategy, the
manufacturing sector in Zimbabwe has to become internationally competitive if it is to
hold its share of the domestic market and to gain a position on the international market.
This requires stringent management of production costs and product quality assurance.
Alongside these pressures exist pressures of rational energy use and sound environmental
management. A significant amount of cost management measures relate to energy efficiency
which has direct benefits to cost savings. Sound environmental management, however, which
has become an obvious expectation of the market can if managed proactively yield optimum
resource utilization at the shop floor resulting in cost savings. But if done reactively,
environmental management interventions normally show up as costs from which the company
sees no gains.
In the Zimbabwean situation energy efficiency management is low and proactive
environmental management is limited as companies are either not carrying out any rational
energy use and environmental management practices or are focusing on "step one"
activities such as energy and environment audits as opposed to the more sophisticated
approaches involving resource use optimization.
Energy and environmental management issues also show up on the supply side of the
equation both as costs to the economy and as negative effects on the environment. In the
past more than 12% of GDP was spent on expansion of power sector. As Zimbabwe needs energy
to raise productivity and improve the living standards, energy demand would increase in
future thereby entailing greater investment costs to the economy and perhaps expanded
environmental degradation from energy supply and utilization activities. Historically the
country's energy needs have been met by expanding the supply base with little attention
being paid to the efficiency of energy use. This approach is now, however, raising serious
financial, institutional, and environmental problems. The magnitude of these problems
underlines the need for devising strategies for improving the efficiency with which energy
is currently produced and used and the approaches adopted for sound management of
environmental impacts of the energy sector.
During this and other studies on related issues, it became evident that indeed there is
no fundamental difference of opinion and purpose among the various stakeholders on matters
of energy efficiency and environmental management. Rather, Zimbabwe is in a unique
situation where industry, government and NGOs agree on the objective of rational energy
use and sound environmental management and together have made various efforts to device
workable approaches to enhance this objective. Industry, working mostly through the
Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries' specialised committees on energy and environment,
holds consultations with Government and research institutions toward this goal. The
Department of Energy and the Ministry of Environment and Tourism's Environmental Planning
and Monitoring Unit have carried out a number of activities either through studies or
through legislative reform in light of pressure from the national consensus on matters of
energy and environment.
Despite these efforts, very little actual progress has been made in improving
industrial energy efficiency and in adopting rational environmental practices. At first
sight, it might appear that there is lack of intent but the flurry of activities in this
area do not confirm that conclusion. Rather, as the study has found out, there are some
genuine barriers to these efforts.
The study documented below focused on these barriers and on suggesting approaches to
their removal. As background and to build a context to its analysis, the study provides a
rather extensive review of the energy sector but focuses mainly on coal and electricity
and the environmental impacts of their supply and utilization.
Energy-Environmental linkages have assumed greater importance in the recent past as the
impact of green-house gases (mainly CO2) on climate change was realized.
However, in Zimbabwe, pollution has remained at a low level. Pollution assessments have
been carried out under the Ministry of Health through the Air Pollution Control Unit and
by the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare who assess emissions of dust
from coal as well as work place exposure to hazardous chemicals and emissions.
In 1992 UNEP-Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment (UNEP-CCEE), Denmark and
Southern Centre for Energy and Environment (SCEE), Zimbabwe, prepared a country report for
Zimbabwe on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Abatement Costing. Abatement technologies for both supply
side and demand side were identified in the study to reduce GHG emissions.
UNEP-CCEE's work on the Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costing Studies confirmed that for most developing countries, including Zimbabwe, scheduling GHG abatement options is likely to follow regular national development activities agenda and much less an agenda for mitigating global environmental issues. This national agenda would stress mitigation of local pollution and environmental degradation if environmental issues are at all included in the national development programme. This may mean that in the energy sector GHG emissions abatement may be achieved but only as a bonus on activities intended to mitigate local environmental problems.
As environmental issues related to energy sector are very extensive, the present study
endeavours to address environmental impacts of the entire energy cycle focusing on coal
use in industry and power generation. Zimbabwe has proven coal reserves of more than 700
million tonnes, and the potential of geological coal resources is estimated beyond 30
billion tonnes. The conventional applications of coal include electricity generation,
steam traction in railway transport, industrial boilers, tobacco curing, and coking. As
coal is the major source of energy for Zimbabwe, present study aims at identification of
environmental impacts of the entire coal cycle from mining to end-users of electrical
energy.
In view of above and the interest expressed by the Ministry of Transport and Energy in
taking up practical measures to pursue environmentally sound energy development
strategies, the present project endeavours to examine the issues which may have a bearing
on a strategy to implement sound environmental management in the energy sector.
In view of the fact that energy, like capital and labour, is a key input to production
processes, the objective of the strategy developed in this report is not to pursue energy
efficiency as an end in itself, but as a means to an end where the end includes minimizing
total costs of production as general focus.
The scope of the study, accordingly, includes:
Delineation of present sources of energy, projection of future energy demand and
collection of information on energy sector development plans.
Delineation of broad environmental impacts due to energy related activities.
Detailing environmental impact due to coal mining and coal based thermal power generation.
Development of emission scenarios for energy sector development plans.
Delineation of technological options to reduce pollution due to coal mining and thermal
power generation.
Delineation of barriers to implementation of environmentally sound energy technology.
Delineation of institutional and financial mechanism to implement the emissions
reduction measures.
Delineation of the different roles of multi-lateral and bi-lateral institutions and
agencies in the transfer and diffusion of sound energy supply and end-use technology.
Formulation of action plans for implementing strategies for minimizing negative
environmental impacts of energy related activities
The study has been jointly carried out by UNEP-CCEE, Denmark, Southern Centre for
Energy and Environment (SCEE), Zimbabwe and National Environmental Engineering Research
Institute (NEERI), India. UNEP-CCEE and NEERI experts visited Zimbabwe in January and May
1994, interacted with the government officers, industries and financial institutions to
collect necessary data. This study report has been jointly prepared by the participating
institutions.
The major limitation of the study is that it was carried out in a situation where the
present status of energy related environmental pollution is unspecified. Information on
air pollution, water pollution and land degradation due to energy related activities has
not been systematically documented. For this reason, it was not possible to assess impacts
of pollution prevention or control strategies in terms of improvements in local
environmental quality in quantitative terms due to the lack of a bench mark upon which to
judge such improvement.
Zimbabwe relies mainly on coal for thermal energy in industry and power generation.
This fuel provides the bulk of industrial energy and produces about 70% of total national
electrical energy. Electricity is also produced from hydro resources of the Zambezi.
Biomass (mainly fuel wood) is the main source of energy for rural household who represent
about 77% of total households in the country. The energy balance for Zimbabwe for 1991
which is shown in Table 2.1 shows a detailed breakdown of source and applications of
energy among the various economic sectors of the economy. The figures indicate the
dominance of wood in the national energy base. Wood has not been a commercial fuel in the
past but is becoming more so particularly in urban areas. All petroleum products used in
the country are imported.
Sources and applications of each of these fuels are discussed in greater detail below.
The major source of hydropower for Zimbabwe is Zambezi river which has a total
potential of 7200 MW of which 4200 MW can be developed by Zimbabwe jointly with Zambia.
The two countries share a hydroelectric power station on the Kariba dam which was built on
the Zambezi river in 1955-1960. The present total capacity is 1266 MW which was developed
as follows:
4 x 150 MW gen sets that were installed on the Zambian side and commissioned in 1962.
These sets which are known as the North Bank Power Station are shared equally between
Zambia and Zimbabwe giving each country a 300 MW share of the station.
6 x 110 MW gen sets which were installed on the southern bank (the Zimbabwe side) of
the river in 1976-77 and are known as Kariba South Bank Power Station. This later
installation brought the Kariba dam's hydro-electric power capacity to 1266 MW and under
the equal share agreement, Zimbabwe owns 633 MW of this capacity.
The Kariba Power Station has recently been affected by drought and the flows into the
lake have been progressively low since the early eighties, resulting in a critical fall in
levels which almost rendered the station in-operable in 1992/93. In August 1993, the lake
level was about one meter above the power station intake level and projections were
putting the water to last till November 1993. The drought resulted in change of preference
towards thermal plants which are less affected by poor rains. The Zambezi offers
additional hydroelectric resources at Batoka gorge, Devil's gorge, Mupata gorge and at
Cahora Bassa in Mozambique. The potential hydroelectric resources are shown in Table 2.2.
Sites for mini hydro plants in Zimbabwe have been assessed but the total potential has not been stated. Table 2.3 shows some of the potential sites and their capacity based on historical performance of their hydrology.
Table 2.2. Potential hydroelectric resources on River Zambezi
| Site | Capacity, MW |
| Batoka Gorge Devil's Gorge Mupata Gorge Cahora Bassa |
1600 1240 1000 2000 |
| Total | 5740 |
Source: ZESA
Table 2.3. Potential mini-hydro sites in Zimbabwe
| Site | Capacity, MW |
| Bangala Kyle Siya Odzani Smallbridge Manyuchi II Ruti Palawan Mwenge II Jumbo |
800 1500 450 60 70 170 200 170 100 30 |
| Total | 3550 |
Source: DOE study on hydroelectric potential of irrigation dams.
Zimbabwe has a total of 10.6 billion tonnes of coal in situ in 21 deposits. Coal
deposits occur in the younger rocks at the northern and southern edges of the basement
shield. Proven reserves can last for 107 years and total reserves over 2000 years at
present production rate of 4.7 million tonnes per year (TPY). A breakdown of coal reserves
in the country is shown in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4. Coal reserves in Zimbabwe
| Proven reserves Estimated reserves Total reserves including probable |
0.502 bn tonnes 2.000 bn tonnes 10.600 bn tonne |
Source: DOE/ESMAP
The country has two coal mines. One is the Wankie Colliery with production capacity of
6 million tonnes per year. Of the present output of 4.5 million tonnes per year, 2
million tonnes are processed and sold as industrial washed or dry coal and 2.5 million
tonnes are used as run-of-mine steam coal at the Hwange power plant. The second mine is
the Sengwa Coal Mine with production capacity of 200,000 TPY which was shut down after two
years of operation due to viability problems. The mine produced low-sulfur, low-phosphate
metallurgical coal for the smelting industry, to displace import of high quality coal from
South Africa. Wankie coal has 2.5% sulphur compared to Sengwa coal with 0.5% sulphur. Both
types of coal have an average calorific value of about 27 MJ/kg.
Wankie colliery has both surface and underground works. Proven reserves at Wankie are
302 mn M.T. (185 mn M.T. of steam coal and 117 mn M.T. of coking coal). Out of these 240
mn M.T. are open-castable. The surface mine produces a low quality high ash content (25%
ash) coal from the top of the seam. This coal is termed the HPS (Hwange Power
Station) coal and is used entirely for the Hwange Power Station. Coal
with an ash content of 35% to 40% is rejected as waste. The lower part of the seam
produces higher quality steam coal, less than 16% ash, which is supplied to industry and
agriculture. The bottom of the seam produces coking coal which is used for supplying to
the coke ovens at the colliery and at ZISCO, a steel smelter. Underground coal is produced
for blending with the coking coal in the processing plant. Underground coal has a sulfur
content of about 3% but has a low phosphorous content which makes it suitable for the
ferrochrome industry. The coal has a heat value of about 28 MJ per kg. The underground
mine produces 15% of the total colliery output and it is planned to increase output by
mechanizing. Proven coal reserves at Sengwa are 200 mn M.T. which is totally
open-castable.
Coal-based thermal power generation assumed an important role in energy supply scenario
of Zimbabwe since 1984 when Hwange Power Station was built at the Wankie coal mine. At
present, Zimbabwe has an installed coal based thermal capacity of 1295 MW with a total
annual coal intake of 2,856,673 tonnes a year in 1990-91. The role of coal in power
generation is highlighted in Table 2.5. The details of present installed capacity and
power station performance are presented in Table 2.5 and 2.6.
Table 2.5. Role of coal in power generation
| Fuel/source | Power generation, MWh | |||
| 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | |
| Coal Hydro Imports ZESA purchases from Pvt. generators |
5391 2666 899 - |
5374 3196 875 - |
4992 4396 355 - |
5771 3153 1165 - |
Source: ZESA Annual reports
Table 2.6. Power station technical data
| Name of station | Construction year | No. of units | Size (MW) | Installed capacity | Generating voltage (kV) |
| Hwange 1 | 1983 | 4 | 120 | 480 | 10.5 |
| Hwange 2 | 1985 | 2 | 220 | 440 | 17.0 |
| Munyati | 1947 | 2 5 |
10 20 |
20 100 |
11.0 11.0 |
| Harare 2 | 1946 | 2 2 2 |
7.5 10.0 20.0 |
15 20 40 |
11.0 11.0 11.0 |
| Harare 3 | 1957 | 2 | 30 | 60 | 11.0 |
| Bulawayo | 1948 | 2 3 |
15 30 |
30 90 |
11.0 11.0 |
| Total | 1295 | 11.0 |
Source: ZESA Annual report 1993
The Kariba South units are being uprated to about 125 MW, and a similar exercise is in
progress at Munyati and Harare.
Table 2.7. Electrical energy production and station performance for 1993
| Station | Electricity Sentout | Avail. % |
Load factor % |
Calorific value MJ/Kg |
Sentout Eff. % |
Coal Req. Kg/kWh |
| Hwange 1 Hwange 2 |
82.57 83.33 |
73.31 53.48 |
||||
| Total | 4755.1 | 82.93 | 63.83 | 25.37 | 28.09 | 0.49 |
| Munyati Harare Bulawayo Kariba |
259.8 228.9 162.1 2061.9 |
43.45 45 45.76 ***** |
26.35 21.31 16.99 ***** |
30.778 28.5 29.572 **** |
17.08 20.15 18.11 ***** |
0.672 0.625 0.685 **** |
Source: ZESA Annual report 1993
Wood is the single largest source of energy in Zimbabwe, supplying about 48% of total
energy consumed in the country. More than 6 million tonnes of wood are consumed annually
supplying mainly rural and urban low income households. This is equivalent to clear
felling of 100,000 ha; or a sustainable yield from two million hectares of reasonable
quality woodland. This is also equivalent to a yield from more than 10 million hectares of
sparse cover on rough grazing land. Demand for fuel wood exceeds supply in four of the
eight provinces (Manicaland, Mashonaland East, Masvingo and Midlands). Early in the next
century, only Mashonaland West and Matabeleland South, provinces with the lowest
population densities, are likely to retain a wood surplus.
Table 2.8. National fuelwood supply and demand (million tonnes)
| 1992 | 1997 | 2002 | |
| Demand Yields Stock depletion Shortfall |
10.62 5.63 3.77 1.22 |
12.14 4.92 1.57 5.65 |
14.03 4.67 3.01 6.35 |
| Total stocks | 633.32 | 603.19 | 605.87 |
Source: The Southern African environment, profiles of the SADC countries, 1993
Zimbabwe does not have known oil reserves. There has been some exploratory work in the
Zambezi valley but no deposits have been identified yet. The transport sector relies on
imported liquid fuels which are brought in by pipeline from Beira in Mozambique to Mutare
and are distributed by road and rail. A project is underway to extend the pipeline to
Harare.
The fuel is used in the transport sector only. There is no extensive use of fuel oils
in industry. Kerosene is used to a limited extent and some boilers exist that use diesel
but the fuel use is insignificant and can be ignored. Petrol is mixed with ethanol to form
a blend that is used for petrol engines. The ethanol production is based on sugar
production.
Biogas
Biogas offers an option for supply of household and agro-industrial energy in Zimbabwe.
More than 200 digesters have been installed in Zimbabwe which range in capacity from 3
cubic meters to 16 cubic meters. The basic feedstock is cow dung or pig manure. Two types
of biogas digesters have been introduced in the country which has no tradition with this
type of technology. These are the Indian and Chinese types.
Initial dissemination constraints were encountered due to lack of a local source of biogas lamps. A local source has now been developed and with all other materials for the technology being locally available, the diffusion of this technology should be much faster than hitherto experienced.
Solar and wind energy
Zimbabwe experiences an insolation of 2000 kW/m2 per year. Insolation is
uniform across the country and across the seasons.
Wind speeds in Zimbabwe are relatively low at only 3.2 m/sec. Information recorded by
the meteorological office shows that the highest wind speeds are experienced at Bulawayo
(4.25 m/s), Chipinge (3.8 m/s) and Gweru (3.8 m/s). These speeds are irregular both
by season and by area and vary widely diurnally. This wind regime rules out utilization of
wind energy for power generation. This resource is however sufficient to enable
utilization of wind mills for water pumping.
At present there are a few companies supplying wind mills for power generation.
Other energy resources in Zimbabwe include electricity imports from Zambia (up to 300
MW) which depend on the flows on the Zambezi and imports of about 120 MW from Zaire.
Electricity imports are limited by load growth in the exporting country. Imports from
Zambia are expected to stop by 2000. The electricity system is also interconnected with
South Africa at Beitbridge and with Botswana at Francistown. Imports from South Africa
offer a more expensive option and would only serve as emergency support. Even then, a 500
MW interconnection with South Africa will be completed by the end of the year. System
interconnection, however, serves to improve reliability as outages in one system can be
compensated by the other.
At the Triangle sugar mill, bagasse is burnt to produce electricity. The plant can
produce up to 15 MW during the harvesting season and 5 MW out of season. Electricity is
used on the plant and is also sold to ZESA consumers in the area when there is a surplus.
There is a recent power purchase agreement between ZESA and an independent producer in the
Chimanimani area. The electricity will be produced by a 700 kW mini-hydro plant and will
be sold entirely to the utility. This agreement has served to indicate the willingness of
the utility to purchase private power, an option which has been missing in the energy
sector in Zimbabwe. The tariff agreement provides for a guaranteed price of 80% of the
ZESA tariff which assists in project planning for new producers.
Commercial energy demand in Zimbabwe is for manufacturing industry, mining,
agriculture, transport, commerce and households. Industry uses most of the coal based
energy for steam raising and furnaces and as electricity from the coal fired power
stations. The final energy consumption is shown in Table 2.9.
Table 2.9. Energy consumption by fuels (TJ)
| 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | % 1990 | |
| Coal Ethanol Jet A1 Gasoline Diesel AvGas Wood |
103487 855 2371 7985 18410 120 103457 |
139660 868 2586 8316 18864 131 106560 |
131791 600 3095 9562 20683 119 109757 |
137189 840 3752 10132 23071 145 113050 |
47.6 0.3 1.3 3.5 8.0 0.1 39.2 |
Source: DOE energy data base
Thermal power generation is the prominent user of coal seconded by the manufacturing
sector. Coal is also used in agriculture for tobacco curing. Most of the industrial energy
is supplied from coal. Coal is used for steam raising and smelting in furnaces. There is a
coking plant at the colliery in Hwange and at the Zisco Steel plant in Redcliff. A total
of about 534,000 tonnes of coke is consumed in industry every year.
Table 2.10. Coal consumption by sector for 1990 (tonnes)
| End-use Sector | Consumption Tonnes | % share |
| Iron and steel Railway traction Power generation Mining Cement production Brick making Sugar refineries Agriculture Other industry Exports |
660082 189799 2843000 87161 107521 56561 47873* 394575 312657** 65523 |
13.9 4.0 59.7 1.8 2.3 1.2 1.0 8.3 6.6 4.4 |
| Total | 4574953 |
* Lowveld sugar industry only
** Inclusive of other sugar refineries
Source: WCC Annual report
Liquid petroleum fuels are imported as refined products. There is no refinery in
Zimbabwe as the only refinery build before independence was closed on commissioning due to
UN imposed sanctions in 1965. The fuel is transported by pipeline to Mutare from where it
is transported by road and rail to major distribution centres. Transportation by road is
very expensive and to reduce this cost, a pipeline is being built from Mutare to Harare.
The main categories of liquid fuels that are imported are diesel, gasoline, kerosene
and aviation fuels. Almost all liquid fuels are used in the transport sector except for
very small quantities which are used in industry for oil fired boilers and boiler starting
and flame stabilization at Hwange power station. The power station consumes about 15
million litres of diesel per year. The low income household sector also uses kerosene for
cooking and lighting.
In the transport sector the large vehicles for road freight and public transport are
entirely diesel powered. The government has therefore maintained a differential price
between diesel and petrol as a way of protecting agriculture and commerce. Gasoline is
used mainly for light motor vehicles and is blended with locally produced ethanol at 13%
ethanol to 87% gasoline.
Aviation fuels are supplied in two main groups mainly Jet A1 and Aviation gas (Avgas).
Jet A1 is a light fuel for jet engines and avgas is used for mainly small piston aircraft
engines. The table below gives the figures of liquid fuels imported in 1991.
Table 2.11. Liquid fuel consumption 1991
| Fuel | Consumption in '000 cum |
| Ethanol Diesel Petrol Jet A1 Kerosine AvGas LPG Fuel oil |
17 638 328 100 68 5 12 1 |
Source: DOE data base
Analysis of electricity consumption in various sectors is presented in Tables 2.12 and
2.13. It could be seen that even though industrial energy consumption has reduced by 8.39%
in the period 1990-93, still it consumes 40% of total electricity produced. Another
interesting feature to be noted is that demand from the commercial sector and lighting has
been increasing over the years. These two sectors hold potential for implementation of
energy efficiency measures.
While total domestic demand has also increased substantially, it is not clear from available data whether the increase is due to rural electrification or due to increased use of electrical appliances in presently electrified households. However it is noteworthy that in the past three years ZESA has been increasing the rate of new household connections in the urban areas.
Table 2.12. Electricity sales by consumer classification
| Class of consumer | Energy sales (GWh) | |||
| 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | |
| Mining | 1473896 | 1518450 | 1549657 | 1306235 |
| Industrial | 4278016 | 4052714 | 809793 | 593059 |
| Farming | 770639 | 834050 | 809793 | 593059 |
| Commercial & lighting | 900112 | 1043486 | 1141369 | 1035716 |
| Domestic metered | 1140226 | 1273479 | ||
| Domestic load limited | 460358 | 443167 | ||
| Total domestic | 1449182 | 1542937 | 1600584 | 1716646 |
| National sales | 8871845 | 8991637 | 9247947 | |
| Total exports | 18751 | |||
| Grand total | 9266698 | |||
Source: ZESA Annual report 1993
Table 2.13. Electricity sales by consumer classification
| Class of consumer | % consumption | |||
| 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | |
| Mining | 16.61 | 16.89 | 16.76 | 16.90 |
| Industrial | 48.22 | 45.07 | 44.84 | 39.83 |
| Farming | 8.69 | 9.28 | 8.76 | 7.67 |
| Commercial & lighting | 10.15 | 11.61 | 12.34 | 13.40 |
| Domestic metered | 12.33 | 16.47 | ||
| Domestic load limited | 4.98 | 5.73 | ||
| Total domestic | 16.33 | 17.16 | 17.31 | 22.21 |
Source: ZESA Annual report 1993
The following assumptions were used in making energy projections shown in Table 2.14.
The projections are based on energy demand and macro-economic data presented in the
UNEP/Southern Centre GHG Abatement Costing Study for Zimbabwe carried out in 1993. These
figures included the following:
Analysis of the energy use by fuel figures for Zimbabwe for 1980 to 1992 which shows no
major change in percentage contribution of each fuel to the total national energy balance.
GDP projections presented in the UNEP/Southern Centre GHG report. These were adopted as
correct together with the figures for energy intensity of production and the Autonomous
Energy Efficiency Improvement Factors assumed in that report.
Energy intensity factors and AEEI values for the Zimbabwean economy.
An additional assumption was made that the percentage contribution by fuel will remain
as in 1990 and the total energy use can be split by fuel using those figures in the
forecast years.
For the electricity sector which forms a key segment in this study, the present ZESA
development plan was adopted.
Table 2.14. Energy demand by fuel in TJ
| % | 1990 | 2010 | 2030 | 2050 | |
| Coal Ethanol Jet A1 Gasoline Diesel AvGas Wood |
47.6 0.3 1.3 3.5 8.0 0.1 39.2 |
137189 840 3752 10132 23071 145 113050 |
229112 1402 6266 16929 38529 242 188799 |
348492 2133 9531 25737 58605 368 287173 |
496916 3042 13590 36699 83566 525 409481 |
| Total | 100.0 | 288179 | 481273 | 732042 | 1043822 |
Source: Southern Centre projections
Since the opening of the Hwange power station in 1984, coal demand has been dominated
mainly by coal requirements for electricity generation. Before that, the supply regime was
geared more toward industrial demand for boiler coal and for coke. In the future, coal
demand will be influenced more by the following factors.
Power generation at Hwange units 7 & 8 which are to be commissioned in the year
2000. This will result in an additional coal demand of 1.1 million tonnes per year
From the year 1995 to year 2000, regional hydropower of 400 MW will be available
through Cahora Bassa line. This will reduce the demand for coal for electricity generation
in this period unless ZESA chooses to maximise domestic generation by base loading its
thermal units.
Refurbishment of old thermal power plants which is due for completion by year 1996.
These plants will then re-enter the electricity supply system and account for additional
coal demand.
Economic growth driven increase in coal demand for mining and products such as base
metals, tobacco, pulp and paper and textiles.
It is also expected that the adoption of energy efficient technologies would reduce
energy intensity of industrial production and thereby place downward pressure on coal
demand. This factor, however, is not expected to have a significant influence as economic
growth would have an upward push on demand.
Department of Energy Resources and Development of Zimbabwe, in 1992, and the Energy
Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) of the World Bank carried out an exercise
to develop an integrated energy strategy for Zimbabwe. The exercise projected coal demand
up to 2010 based on growth trends in energy demand for the period 1981-89. Coal demand was
projected for a number of scenarios. These included:
A trend case with a GDP growth rate of 3.0% p.a.
A policy-neutral case with a GDP growth rate of 4.5% p.a. and little or no energy
demand management practised.
A policy active scenario with a GDP growth 4.5% p.a.
and a demand management case involving measures to improve energy efficiency.
Using data in these scenarios, this study revised the policy active scenario and
produced new projections shown below in Table 2.15.
2.3.3 Liquid fuel demand forecast
Liquid fuel demand is dependent on the vehicle mix and fleet size. As the economy grows
there will be a larger population albeit of more efficient motor vehicles. Demand for road
transport for freight will increase with the increased demand for movement of manufactured
goods. It is difficult to make demand projections for liquid fuels based on historical
trends due to the changes in economic policy that have caused a major shift in economic
activities. Further, liquid fuel demand is not considered for assessing environmental
impact in present study.
Table 2.15. Coal demand forecast 1989 to 2010 ('000 tonnes)
| Sector | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2010 |
| Agriculture Electricity Industry Mining Transport Other Exports |
395 2685 1211 87 190 281 66 |
395 811 1729 60 216 350 66 |
395 3014 1891 60 10 437 66 |
395 3116 2348 60 10 678 66 |
| Total | 4915 | 3627 | 5873 | 6673 |
Source: Southern Centre/ESMAP
The electrical energy forecast for Zimbabwe has been based on knowledge of historical
demand regressed to project future demand. The demand projection is typical of developing
systems where the early pattern is almost a straight line that changes to exponential
function as the economy grows. Successes achieved with the use of historical data in the
short term have been due to the system being still in the first part of the curve and the
dependence of the supplied demand on utility investment. There are a number of
developments in the country that are set to increase domestic load significantly. These
include the following:
The economy has a large number of (mainly domestic) consumers whose demand is not being
met due to limited investment on the part of the utility, and the potential additional
demand could be 100 to 200 MW.
There are a few industrial projects that are in the pipeline including a 38 MW platinum
mine and the construction of several industrial entities in the major cities.
There has been a very large country-wide housing development initiative by both the
private sector and government, and urban accommodation is now virtually built for
connection of electricity.
It is therefore forecast that demand will increase steadily in the foreseeable future.
The ZESA load forecast shown below is based on trend analysis and the development plans
submitted by industry.
Table 2.16. Electrical energy demand forecast (GWh)
| Sector | 1994 | 1995 | 2000 |
| Agriculture Industry Mining ZESA Domestic Commerce |
818 3458 1356 11 1843 1144 |
848 3639 1414 11 1912 1190 |
990 4399 1715 13 2283 1420 |
| Total | 8630 | 9014 | 10820 |
Source: ZESA load forecast
The system development plans for ZESA are based on the criteria that the internal
generation should be equal or excess to the demand and the system should be planned for a
minimum reserve of 25% with imports exceeding or meeting the reserve margin.
The current development plans include refurbishment of the existing plants, augmenting
cooling capacity and control equipment upgrading at the Hwange power station, construction
of interconnectors, and construction of new plant at Batoka, Sengwa, and Hwange. Demand
Side Management is not included in the ZESA's development plans. The following section
provides some information on the utility's system development plan and a list of major
projects indicating the sequence and dates.
The Ministry of Transport and Energy is the responsible authority for energy policy and
for public administration of the energy sector in Zimbabwe. The organ responsible for the
day-today administration of this sector is Department of Energy in this Ministry.
The Department of Energy (DOE) is headed by a director who reports to the Permanent
Secretary in the Ministry.
The DOE does not have exclusive control over all matters in the energy sector. A number
of other institutions including other Government Ministries, international oil companies,
private mining companies and the National Railways of Zimbabwe influence activities in
this sector particularly with respect to pricing of energy products such as coal and
petroleum.
Management of the coal sector falls under the Ministry of Mines, and the involvement of
the Ministry of Energy is mainly as a major consumer through ZESA which operates all coal
thermal power plants in the country.
Table 2.17. Zimbabwe electrical energy supply system development plan
| Project | Capacity Addition (MW) | Years |
| Kariba refurbishment Small thermal refurbishment Interconnector to South Africa Cahora Bassa Hwange upgrading Hwange 7 Hwange 8 Batoka Sengwa 1 Sengwa 2 Sengwa 3 |
84 120 400 500 reliability 220 220 800 220 220 220 |
1994 - 1997 1994 - 1996 1994 - 1995 1994 - 1996 1994 - 1996 1996 - 2000 1996 - 2000 1997 - 2004 1998 - 2004 1999 - 2004 2001 - 2006 |
The projects carry a total investment cost of US $ 2804730-00
Source: ZESA
Table 2.18. Electrical energy development plan
| Project | Year | Capacity MW | ||
| Hydro | Thermal | Total | ||
| RSA Intercountry Cahora Bassa Hwange Upgrade Old Thermal Refurb Kariba Refurb Hwange 8 Hwange 7 Sengwa 2 Sengwa 1 Batoka Sengwa 3 |
1995 1996 1996 1996 1997 2000 2000 2004 2004 2004 2006 |
500 84 800 |
400 120 220 220 220 220 220 |
400 900 900 1020 1104 1324 1544 1764 1984 2784 3004 |
Source: ZESA
Coal mining in Zimbabwe has until 1989 been the monopoly of the Wankie Colliery
Company, a subsidiary of the Anglo American Corporation. This company mined and controlled
the only economically viable deposits in the country, the Wankie Concession area.
Following independence in 1980 Government took 40 % share of the colliery company and
allowed a second company Sencol, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto Zimbabwe, to mine a second
deposit at Sengwa. Sencol coal is mainly used in the steel industry.
Wankie Colliery Company operates on a Government guaranteed cost-plus pricing formula
and controls 100% of the coking coal market and 95.6% of total coal production in the
country. The significance of this monopoly is that the company has had no cause to improve
production efficiency.
The electricity sector is the sole supply domain of Zimbabwe Electricity Supply
Authority (ZESA) which generates, imports and distributes all electrical energy in the
country except for a few small private generators run either as stand alone systems in
remote communities or as back-up systems by large urban companies and in some schools and
hospitals.
Environmental impact is any alteration of environmental conditions or creation of a new
set of environmental conditions, adverse or beneficial, caused or induced by the project
under consideration. Impact on environment depends on the nature, scale and location of
the activity. Environmental impacts include effects on the natural resource base; quality
of air, water, noise, biological & socio-economic components of environment; effect on
public health and also cost of environmental management.
The range of environmental issues related to energy generation, transmission and use is
very extensive. The relative significance attached to different environmental issues
varies widely. Environmental problems have to be considered in terms of:
global issues, particularly global warming
national or regional issues, where the scope is a few hundred or thousand miles
local impacts (i.e. within a few miles of an energy facility)
workplace exposure to high temperatures, dust, particulates, sulphur dioxide and high
humidity for industry and agriculture.
Local environmental concerns raised by coal fired power generation relate to the
environmental pollution caused by the following activities:
coal mining and storage in the mining premises, as well as its transportation,
handling, crushing and storage in the power station premises,
coal combustion, steam generation, which contribute to GHG emissions
condenser cooling water disposal and wastewater treatment.
These activities are discussed in greater detail under section 3.3 below.
Local impacts, which are generally site-related, are perhaps the longest established
category. The environmental damage can range from the aesthetic (impact of thermal power
plant in remote countryside) to airborne pollution (particulate deposition from fossil
fuel use) to ecological change (flooding in hydro schemes).
The national/ regional category of environmental impacts which mainly include acid rain
and global warming is mainly of post-second worldwar vintage. CO2 is
responsible for around 50% of the impact of the various greenhouse gases associated with
global warming. The energy sector as a whole is responsible for the great bulk of this and
the power sector is in turn responsible for the majority of the energy sector's
contribution. It is therefore clear that at all levels coal combustion in the electric
power sector is a major contributor to environmental problems.
Carbon dioxide occurs naturally in the atmosphere and plays an important role in almost
all living organisms. Measurements show that its concentration has been on the rise, and
since industrialization it has gone up by nearly 25 percent. The main cause is considered
to be burning of fossil fuels, during which carbon contained in the fuels is oxidized and
released into the atmosphere. The destruction of forests has also contributed to this rise
as the vegetation provides a sink for roughly one half of the carbon dioxide released into
the atmosphere stays while the other half is absorbed by the ocean and plants. Prediction
models suggest that as a result of the combined effect of increased emissions of CO2
and other green house gases the Earth's average surface temperature would increase by 1.5
to 4.5oC (UNEP, 1993). This seemingly marginal increase will have far reaching
consequences in terms of changes in climate, rain fall patterns, agricultural practices
and sea levels.
Coal is composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur with small amounts
of other trace elements. When coal is burnt in an adequate amount of oxygen, its
combustion produces heat energy as a result of the chemical reactions which take place
when the combustible components of coal viz. Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H) and Sulphur (S) are
oxidized. The sulphur present in coal is of two types:
Inorganic Sulphur (mainly present as pyrites)
Organic Sulphur (forms the part of overall coal matrix)
Most of the inorganic sulphur can be removed by coal beneficiation techniques but only
part of organic sulphur can be removed by chemical treatment although at exorbitant costs.
The oxides of sulphur (SOx) and of nitrogen (NOx) are the
principal chemical pollutant products of coal combustion. When these gases are emitted by
the power station chimneys, over half of the emissions fall to earth in dry form,
relatively near the source. In the presence of sunlight and other chemical oxidants
present in the atmosphere, some of the remaining air-borne sulphur and nitrogen oxides are
transformed into sulphites and nitrates and finally these sulphites and nitrates form H2SO4
and HNO3. These acids which deposit in wet form about 200-1000 km away from the
source are known as acid rain.
The impacts of acid rain are most pronounced on:
Quality of lake water and aquatic habitat
Vegetation
Fertility of sensitive soils and
Mutilation of monuments and structures of immense architectural value
Coal production involves acquisition of large surface land both for underground and
opencast mines and results in varying impact on environment and ecology.
Air borne emissions from coal mining consist of particulates, NOx, CO,
hydrocarbons and sulphur compounds. These emanate at mine, coal and waste storage piles
and preparation plants. However, the impact is normally limited to local areas.
Uncontrolled fires resulting from spontaneous combustion in abandoned mines and coal piles
overburden dumps produce noxious gases. Surface mining emissions come from diesel
equipments and blasting operations. The air quality impacts of underground mining are
negligible.
The environmental problems of serious nature related to coal mining are:
Land degradation
Change in land use patterns due to mining and disposal of overburden
Deforestation during the mining operation
Soil erosion and land slides
Disruption of drainage pattern of the area
Run-off waste from mines, soil dumps, coal dumps leading to siltation in stream/water
bodies
Water quality degradation due to discharge of mine water into streams, water bodies
etc.
Leaching and erosion of coal dumps and waste dumps
Air pollution due to dust and noxious fumes
Noise and ground vibrations
Socio-economic factors like displacement of families and rehabilitation
Health and safety of workers
Coal is more difficult to transport compared to liquid petroleum products because of
its bulky form. Frequently, more than one transportation mode is required to move it to
the point of consumption. The environmental impacts of coal transportation are spread over
the total distance of the transportation corridor and are often not immediately visible.
The impacts include habitat loss, community disruption, fugitive dust, increase in noise,
and accidents in developing transportation corridors. During the actual transportation of
coal the impacts are generation of fugitive dust, smoke and noise.
Environmental impacts of coal based thermal power generation relate to coal handling,
storage and combustion at the power station. The major environmental impacts of coal
handling activities at the power plant relate to noise, solid waste generated in coal
crushing, and the fugitive dust emissions therefrom. Coal is burned in boilers to generate
steam. During this process gaseous, liquid and solid pollutants are generated. Gaseous
emissions during coal combustion include suspended particulate matter, carbon dioxide,
nitrogen oxide and sulphur dioxide.
Atmospheric emissions of solid particles during coal combustion usually vary in sizes
from 0.01 to 10 micrometre in diameter. While large particles are removed by the emission
control system efficiently, smaller particles are difficult to capture. These smaller
particles in the range of 0.01 to 1.0 micrometre are easily respirable and have adverse
effect on human health. The smallest of particles get deposited in the alveoli of
pulmonary regions while the larger ones tend to be deposited in the nasopharyngeal and
tracheobronchial regions. These particles remain in the respiratory system for 2 to 6
weeks. However, particles of a size less than 0.01 micro metre in diameter are not usually
deposited in the respiratory systems.
For every million Kcals released by the combustion of coal, 385 kg of Carbon Dioxide is
emitted. Concern has grown over the climatic changes brought about by increased carbon
dioxide levels in the atmosphere because of its absorption of infra-red radiation from the
earth. High levels of carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere would produce the
"Green House Effect" which is understood to be increasing the global
temperature.
The oxides of nitrogen are produced by oxidation of nitrogen in air during coal
burning, and to a much lesser extent by the oxidation of nitrogenous compound in coal. The
environmentally important species of nitrogen oxide are nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide.
Nitrogen oxide is a strong irritant and can cause inflammation of the lungs as well as
damage to crops and forests when combined with sulphur dioxide from acid rain.
Sulphur dioxide (SO2) is formed as a result of oxidation of sulphur present
in coal in the process of combustion and it escapes into the atmosphere and gets deposited
locally or is converted into sulphuric acid or sulphates. Its impacts include human health
hazards, damage to crops and forests, metal corrosion and acid rain.
The liquid waste problems associated with thermal power plants are due to discharge of
wastewater from the following different sources:
Circulating water from condensers
Overflow from ash pond
Boiler blow down
Cooling tower blow down
Wastewater from regeneration of demineralization plant
Wastewater from water treatment plants viz. sludge from clarifier and backwash water
from filters etc.
Wastewater from oil storage and handling area
Wastewater from equipment cleaning including boilers
Rain-fall run off from coal pile storage
Floor drains etc.
These wastewaters contain residual chlorine, chromium/zinc sulphates, dissolved and
suspended solids. As temperature of these wastewaters is higher than ambient temperature,
discharge of wastewater in waterbodies affects the aquatic ecosystem downstream of
discharge point.
Ash produced in a thermal power station is of two categories viz: bottom ash and fly
ash. During coal combustion, as much as 80 to 85% of the incombustible fines leave with
combustion gases as fly ash, the remainder is collected as bottom ash. The bottom ash is
collected in boiler bottom hoppers and fly ash in electrostatic precipitator hoppers.
Normally the ash is dumped in low lying waste areas where about 10 to 15 metres of depth
is available which helps in reclaiming the land. If such land is not available man-made
lagoons near the power stations are created. If the size of the fly ash pond is smaller
than that desirable, especially in older plants, a substantial amount of fly ash is
carried into the river system. Improper construction and maintenance of fly ash dykes
causes breaches and subsequent pollution of the receiving water body.
Coal is used in industry for steam generation in boilers and smelting furnaces. Both
these operations require coal transportation, storage and combustion. Compared to thermal
power plants efficiency of coal utilization in industry is low. Environmental impacts of
coal utilization in industry are similar to those of thermal power plant. However, total
emissions are distributed over a large area.
Major problems in coal mining in Zimbabwe relate to water pollution, coal fines
disposal and emissions from the coke ovens plant. The problem of overburden disposal at
Wankie Colliery Company is partly reduced due to use of overburden coal in Hwange power
station.
In Zimbabwe, effluent from mining works is monitored adequately and controlled, but
toxic residues do enter the ecosystem as usually sterile, sometimes toxic, waste. The
major legislations controlling pollution from mining activities are the Hazardous
Substances Act and the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act, which are administered by the
Department of Environmental Health in the Ministry of Health. Major problems in
implementation relate to lack of infrastructure and instrumentation facility for
monitoring.
The Wankie colliery has a processing plant which screens coal according to pebble sizes
and also washes coal for the coking plant and for industry. Washing reduces the ash
content and the sulfur content. The waste water from the washing plant is recycled but
some water is lost through evaporation and spillage. The coal dust removed through washing
is settled out of the water and is piled in dumps. The washing process takes about 40% of
the colliery output and recovers about 88% of the coal that goes through the process and
is aimed at reducing ash content to below 10%. The colliery now uses a centrifuge to
recover washery water as opposed to settling tanks which caused higher losses. The
colliery has plans to blend waste from the washery with coal fines, which are 10% to 20%
of total production, to produce coal with about 25% ash. Trials are underway to use the
coal fines in the production of electrical energy at the Hwange Power Station.
From the 2 million tonnes of the processed coal, the Wankie Colliery generates fines at
a rate of 9 percent of total. To date, between 2 and 3 million tonnes of these fines have
accumulated. Coal fines are presently stockpiled to waste at the coal washing plant at
Wankie Colliery. The stockpiled fines represent an environmental hazard in the form of
(potentially explosive) dust or through filtration into the soil or ground water systems
of the acid from the iron pyrite present in the coal.
About 584000 tonnes of coke are produced every year for industrial use, most of which
is in the iron and steel industry. Coke is now a preferred option for firing bricks since
it can be mixed with the clay and fired at a better efficiency. The coke ovens produce
by-products such as benzol, tar, ammonia and coke oven gas. The benzol is sold to a
chemical plant for distillation and the tar is sold as fuel to industry. The ammonia is
disposed of in wastewater and the coke oven gas is flared. A project for the coke oven gas
to be used in the power station for boiler starting and flame stabilization in place of
diesel has already been constructed and is to be commissioned soon.
The Mines and Minerals Act in Zimbabwe overrides most other acts in that few
restrictions are attached to the exploitation of mining rights once the mining permit has
been obtained. Thus, the Act does not prevent extensive tree cutting without
reforestation, poaching by mine workers, siltation, dumps and non-compliance with
quittance requirements when mines are closed.
Wankie colliery has initiated rehabilitation and revegetation programme on a pilot
scale in abandoned mine sites.
No documented information is available related to environmental impact of thermal power
generation in Zimbabwe. However, it is known that Hwange power station has installed
Electrostatic Precipitators for removal of flyash. A desulphurization unit is not
installed. Also, Hwange power station is facing a flyash disposal problem.
In the absence of institutionalized environmental monitoring mechanism, data on
industrial sources of air pollution and status of pollution control is not available.
Limited data is available for ambient air quality monitoring undertaken by the
University of Zimbabwe for locations near Harare city which is presented in Table 3.1. It
is evident that even in 1988, levels of SO2 in the City Centre and industrial
area were very high. Harare and Bulawayo experience smog during winter. The major problem
in air pollution control relates to lack of monitoring facilities. The only facilities in
Zimbabwe for air sampling and analysis are located at University of Zimbabwe. Urban
councils are expected to monitor sources of air pollution and ambient air quality.
However, these councils do not have infrastructure for the same.
Major enactments in Zimbabwe related to environment are:
Natural Resources Act (1941)
Forest Act (1981) Amendment
Parks and Wildlife Act (1975)
Mines and Minerals Act (1961)
Hazardous Substances and Articles Act (1977)
Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act (1971)
Water Act (1976)
Regional Town and Country Planning Act (1976)
Communal Land Act (1982)
Communal Forest Produce Act (1982)
Rural District Council Act (1988)
Table 3.1. The maximum and minimum levels of gases at Mazoe Farmlands, Mt. Hampden and University Campus (1990)
| Maximum (microgram/m3) | Minimum (microgram/m3) | |||||||
| Place | SO2 | HCl | NO2 | NH3 | SO2 | HCl | NO2 | NH3 |
| Mazowe farms Mt. Hampden University |
1.37 1.30 54.60 |
1.14 1.17 23.70 |
0.89 0.55 8.70 |
1.54 1.56 14.20 |
0.28 0.26 1.34 |
0.71 0.72 1.04 |
0.30 0.30 1.50 |
0.39 0.72 0.95 |
Ambient concentrations of gases (1988) (microgram/m3 under STP)
| University (27) | City Centre (38) | |||||||
| Pollutant | Diurnal mean | Annual mean | Diurnal mean | Annual mean | ||||
| Min | Max | Mean | S.D. | Min | Max | Mean | S.D. | |
| SO2 NO2 NH3 HCl |
2.0 2.0 1.9 9.0 |
52.6 17.2 38.1 55.1 |
25.6 5.0 8.0 30.6 |
23.4 5.3 2.8 14.7 |
4.0 2.0 2.0 16.5 |
142.3 28.0 40.9 78.0 |
60.1 12.8 14.0 43.9 |
52.7 7.3 10.6 13.0 |
| III Industrial Area (36) | Msasa (Fertilizer Plant 14) | |||||||
| SO2 NO2 NH3 HCl |
14.0 3.0 6.0 10.0 |
120.2 75.0 45.0 56.0 |
67.2 20.4 24.5 35.6 |
28.9 15.2 13.8 11.8 |
14.0 4.5 2.0 14.8 |
242.0 27.4 45.3 77.0 |
101.1 13.5 15.8 40.5 |
70.8 8.9 16.5 26.3 |
* figures in parenthesis are total number of samples
Source: Jannalgodda, S.B. and Mathutbu, Environmental Quality Assessment: Studies on
Air and Water Quality in Harare, Zimbabwe
The Mines and Minerals Act overrides all other acts and mines can be set up wherever
minerals exist and at times with serious environmental consequences. Air Pollution
standards in Zimbabwe have been adapted from international standards. The country has been
divided into 17 smoke/dust control zones to facilitate air pollution monitoring.
A major problem with environmental legislation is the fragmented nature of the
legislation and the lack of enforcement power in the Ministry of Environment and Tourism.
In Zimbabwe, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which is under the Ministry of
Environment and Tourism, is responsible for setting standards for environmental quality,
mitigation of adverse impacts of new projects and providing information on environment.
The major thrust of DNR is environmental education. Water Pollution Advisory Board (WPAB)
in the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources monitors water pollution around urban
areas. There is an Air Pollution Control Unit in the Ministry of Health which monitors
levels of atmospheric pollution. The Ministry of Land, Agriculture and Water Development
is responsible for soil conservation practices. The Ministry of Health and Child Welfare
is responsible for various health related practices in industry. An overview of
environmental management institutions in Zimbabwe is presented in Table 3.2.
Environmental issues are taking an increasingly high priority in Zimbabwe. The
Government presented its National Conservation Strategy (NCS) in 1987, which aims "to
integrate sustainable resource use with every aspect of the Nation's social and economic
development and to rehabilitate those resources which are already degraded". The NCS
proposed setting up an Environmental Monitoring Unit, creating a separate Ministry of the
Environment, and establishing an Inter-Ministerial Committee for the environment to
co-ordinate the implementation of the NCS.
Progress has been modest so far. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism was
recently renamed the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, but the Environmental Monitoring
Unit and Inter-Ministerial Committee are not yet active. Responsibility for environmental
policy remains scattered among a variety of Ministries and Boards in Zimbabwe, including
the Ministry of Health (for air pollution), the Ministry of Energy and the Ministry of
Water Resources and Development (for water pollution and energy conservation), the Natural
Resources Board, and the Forestry Commission.
Monitoring and enforcement of environmental standards is not co-ordinated and therefore
lacks effectiveness. Fines for infringing standards, which in some cases remain at the
nominal level set in 1971, do not provide sufficient incentive to invest in pollution
abatement equipment. In addition, foreign exchange constraints in the 1980 made it
difficult for industries to invest in "cleaner" or more energy efficient process
technology or equipment.
Table 3.2. Environmental institutions in Zimbabwe
| Institution | Agencies/Depts etc. | Responsibility | Legislation |
| Ministry of Environment and Tourism | Dept. of Natural Resources Dept of National Parks & Wildlife Environment Monitoring Unit Conservation Committees |
Conserve and enhance environmental quality Management of parks/wildlife estates Afforestation policies |
Natural Resources Act Forest Act Communal Land Forest Act Hazardous Substances and Articles Act |
| Interministerial Committee for the Environment | Preparing action plan following National Conservation Strategy yet to be established | ||
| Ministry of Energy, Water Resources and Development | Water Pollution Advisory Board Water Pollution Control Unit |
Control of water quality and effluents Energy conservation |
Water Act |
| Ministry of Health | Air Pollution Advisory Board Atmospheric Pollution Control Unit Hazardous Substances Control Board (also Control unit) |
Control, abatement, prevention of air pollution Classification of hazardous substances |
Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act Hazardous Substances and Articles Act |
| Ministry of Local Govt., Urban and Rural Development | Dept. of Rural Development | Rural development (overlaps with AGRITEX) | |
| Ministry of Lands, Agriculture and Rural Settlement | AGRITEX (Agricultural, Technical & Extension services) | Soil conservation and land planning at farm level | Mines and Minerals Act Communal Lands Act |
| Ministry of Community and Co-operative Development | Community development at village level | ||
| Non-Governmental Organisations-Environment and Development | |||
| Environment and Development Activities: ENDA Zimbabwean Environmental Organisation (ZERO) |
Zero and ENDA have completed an NGO report on the state of the environment in Zimbabwe for the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Brazil 1992) | ||
Source: The Economic Implications of Limiting CO2 Emissions in Zimbabwe,
January 1992
The Ministry of the Environment is now in the process of preparing action plans to
implement the NCS, and the Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries (CZI) is taking an active
role in promoting environmental awareness and spreading best practices among its members.
In addition there is a variety of non-governmental organisations active in the
environmental field. The emphasis of environmental policy will clearly be on local
pollution issues - particularly problems of water pollution in the areas around Harare and
Bulawayo, degradation of land in communal areas, and the adverse impact of deforestation
on fuelwood supplies and soil quality.
Industrialists in Zimbabwe are now concerned with three possible consequences of
failing to heed the global and national calls for better practices. These are:
the negative effect on selling their products in European and American markets which
might use environmental regulations and environmental performance as non-tariff barriers
for exports,
the possibility of introduction and enforcement of harsher local environmental
legislation if they fail to take positive initiative
the possibility that the new policy and legislation may happen without their input
The implications of continued environmental damage at the production level should
provide sufficient impetus to industry to carry out responsible environmental actions.
This situation is one where self-interest and national-interest coincide.
In Zimbabwe, coal meets more than 45% of the total energy demand followed by fuel wood
which meets 40% of the demand. The implementation of strategies to reduce demand is more
conceivable in the organized industrial sectors (thermal power generation and
manufacturing) than in the domestic sector utilizing wood. Hence, the development of
emission scenarios in the present study is limited to impact of coal utilization. While
reduction of greenhouse gases is directly related to reduction in demand, reductions in
emissions of other gaseous, liquid and solid wastes is a function of the control
technologies that are adopted. In the absence of data on present status of pollution
control no attempt is made in the present study to develop alternate scenarios. The scope
of this study is thus limited to highlighting alarming dimensions of the environmental
impact of energy related activities. This could convince decision makers on the necessity
of formulating national policies and developing appropriate institutional mechanisms as
recommended in the study.
The approaches adopted in the present study for developing emission scenario comprise:
Forecasting coal demand for years 1995, 2000 and 2010
Estimation of theoretical emission factors assuming average coal composition as that
for Wankie Colliery based on ultimate coal analysis and 100% combustion
Survey of emission factors available in literature for coal mining and coal combustion
Working out total emissions for the present and projected coal demand for coal mining
and coal combustion in thermal power plants and industries
Data that is currently available on the above actors is given in Tables 3.3 to 3.7
while Table 3.8 gives some information on the impact of capacity expansion of coal-based
thermal power plants.
Table 3.3. Emission factors for coal mining
| Range (T.E. Edgar) | Present Study | |
| Particulate matter Wastewater SS in wastewater TDS in wastewater Coal dust Vegetation cover removal |
0.005-6.6 lbs/t 25-85 gallon/t 500-2000 mg/l 500-800 mg/l - |
1.500 kg/t 225.000 lit/t 1.500 mg/l 0.600 mg/l 9 % 1.000 ha/1000 t |
Table 3.4. Comparison of emission factors for coal based power plants
| Component | AC Stern kg/t |
TE Edgar kg/t |
WHO kg/t |
Theoretical kg/t |
| Particulates | 7.73 A(1-E) | 7.73 A | 8 A | 10 A |
| SO2 | 17.27 S | 17.27 S | 19 S | 20 S |
| NOx | 9.091 | 8.182 | 9.000 | |
| CO2: Based on carbon content Based on heating value |
C = .871 (58.2+23.8) = .714 kg/kg CO2 = 36.7 C = 2.62 kg/kg Calorific value = 27.5 MJ/kg CO2 emission = 95 kg/GJ 1 GJ heat comes from 36.36 kg coal 1 kg of coal results in 2.61 kg of CO2 |
|||
Note: Particulate emission include both flue gas emissions and ash
Normally ESPs recover 99.5% of particulate matter
Source: Stern, A.C. (1977). Air Pollution Vol. IV, Engineering Control of Air
Pollution, Academic Press, London
Edgar, T.E. (1993). Coal Processing and Pollution Control, Gulf Publishing Company,
London
WHO (1982). Rapid Assessment of Sources of Air, Water, and Land Pollution, WHO Offset
Publication No. 62
Table 3.5. Emission factors adopted in present study
| Component | Emission kg/tonne | |
| Particulates SO2 NOx CO2 |
10.0 * % ash 19.0 * % sulphur 9.0 2.61 |
Ash content 16% Sulphur content 2.5% |
Table 3.6. Total emissions from coal mining
| 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2010 | |
| A. Coal for Power Gen. | ||||
| Particulate matter, tonnes/year | 4027.5 | 1216.5 | 4521.0 | 4674.0 |
| B. Coal for Industrial use | ||||
| Particulate matter, tonnes/year Wastewater, cum/year SS in wastewater, tonnes/year TDS in wastewater, tonnes/year Coal dust, '000 tonnes/year Vegetation cover removal, ha/year |
1816.5 272475.0 408.7 163.5 109.0 3896.0 |
2593.5 389025.0 583.5 233.4 156.0 2540.0 |
2836.5 425475.0 638.2 255.3 170.0 4905.0 |
3522.0 528300.0 792.4 317.0 211.0 5464.0 |
Table 3.7. Total emissions from coal combustion (tonnes/year)
| 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2010 | |
| A. Power generation | ||||
| Particulates SO2 NOx CO HC CO2 |
429600.0 1275.4 24165.0 1342.5 402.7 7007.8 |
129760.0 385.2 7299.0 405.5 121.6 2116.7 |
482240.0 1431.6 27126.0 1507.0 452.1 7866.5 |
498560.0 1480.1 28044.0 1558.0 467.4 8132.8 |
| B. Industrial boilers | ||||
| Particulates SO2 NOx CO HC CO2 |
193760.0 575.2 10899.0 605.5 181.6 3160.7 |
276640.0 821.3 15561.0 864.5 259.3 4512.7 |
302560.0 898.2 17019.0 945.5 283.6 4935.5 |
375680.0 1115.3 21132.0 1174.0 352.2 6128.3 |
| C. Total of A&B | ||||
| Particulates SO2 NOx CO HC CO2 |
623360.0 1850.6 35064.0 1948.0 584.4 10168.6 |
406400.0 1206.5 22860.0 1270.0 381.0 6629.4 |
784800.0 2329.875 44145.000 2452.500 735.750 12802.050 |
874200.0 2995.400 49176.000 2732.000 819.600 14261.040 |
80-85% of particulates would escape to atmosphere unless arrested in pollution control systems
Table 3.8. Impact of capacity expansion of coal based thermal power plant
| Primary impact | Secondary Impact | Tertiary Impact |
| Increase in coal demand | Increase in mining activity Increase in coal washeries activity Increase in coal transportation activity |
Vegetation cover removal, mine water disposal, coal fine disposal Increase in quantity of rejects to be disposed off Increase in demand for road/rail transport |
| Increase in air pollutants emission | Increase in ambient air pollutants levels |
Damage to human health, vegetation and material, climate change, acid rain |
| Increase in heat emissions | Increase in ambient temperature | Changes in local meteorological conditions |
| Increase in cooling water demand | Increase in cooling water quantity to be disposed in receiving waterbody | Impact on aquatic ecosystem |
| Increase in quantity of flyash to be disposed | Increase in cost of disposal |
Energy demand is bound to increase in future and so will the magnitude of adverse
environmental impact. The mitigation options available include devising and implementing
strategies for:
Reduction of adverse environmental impacts related to coal based power generation and
coal use in industry through reduction in electricity/coal demand
Installation of pollution control devices in thermal power plants and air polluting
industries
Restoration of environmental quality through reclamation and revegetation of abandoned
mine sites
Reduction of environmental impacts through coal/electricity demand management is the
most preferred option. This could be achieved through curtailing auxiliary consumption in
thermal power plants and implementation of energy conservation measures in industrial
units. Energy conservation measures range from improved house-keeping to adoption of
energy efficient technologies. Apart from benefiting the environment, these measures would
also result in net savings to industry and conservation of valuable coal resources. Thus
energy conservation is a "negative cost" option. The institutional mechanism to
generate awareness about energy conservation and trained manpower to develop energy
efficiency programmes are, at present, inadequate in Zimbabwe. Also, promotion of energy
efficient technologies would require careful selection, acquisition and adaptation of
technologies. It is, thus, necessary to have a national focal point to address these
challenging tasks.
After reducing environmental impacts by energy demand management to the extent
possible, it will be necessary to employ environmental management technologies to further
reduce impacts. A host of technologies are available for the control of air and water
pollution, and for solid waste management. A review of these technologies is presented in
Annexes I to VI.
The economic viability of these technologies depends on size and location of source of
pollution (thermal power plant/industry), and the selection of appropriate technology
requires data on source and ambient air/water quality. At present there is no centralized
institutional mechanism for environmental monitoring. Environmental legislation is
fragmented and lacks implementation due to inadequate infrastructure. Development of
institutional set-up with proper instrumentation facilities and trained manpower is a
pre-requisite for enforcing existing legislation for effective pollution control.
Information on environmental damage due to air/water/solid wastes from energy related
activities is not available. Wankie Colliery Company has tried a restoration and
revegetation programme for abandoned mine sites. Restoration of environmental damage would
require co-ordinated effort on the part of industry and the government.
In the past, with participation of the Government of Zimbabwe, projects were undertaken
through international funding to assess energy-environment linkages and potential for
energy conservation. Most of the recommendations of these studies are yet to be
implemented. Barriers to implementation of the recommendations have been assessed in the
present report so as to:
identify steps that should be taken to improve on-going programmes
establish mechanism for expanding existing institutional set-up to effectively
implement energy conservation and environmental management programmes
suggest the structuring of a national focal point for energy efficiency programmes in
the form of an autonomous centre to assist industry and government departments
The present study considers "negative cost" options as part of the
implementation strategy to minimize negative environmental impacts. It has been
established in several studies that there exist negative cost or economically viable
options for industry in energy conservation. Industries have however not taken up the
options even after study reports have been presented to them indicating viability of the
options. Options suggested in various studies so far have been reviewed herein.
During the UNEP funded greenhouse gas country studies several options were considered
for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in Zimbabwe. The options included energy use
in industrial processes. The economic evaluation of the options considered the capital
cost as given in project feasibility studies and quotations obtained from equipment
suppliers. The analysis then modelled the fuel use and the operation and maintenance costs
of the reference case and the reduction option given the project lifetime. Annual costs
were derived which showed the cost of the project in relation to the reductions in carbon
dioxide emissions per year. The analysis was from the point of view of the economy and
therefore taxes and duties were not included.
The following table shows some of the results obtained. The table does not include
positive cost options which are not the concern of this study.
Table 4.1. Summary of options in UNEP GHG abatement studies in Zimbabwe
| Reduction Option | Z$/ton CO2 | Units/ size |
Type | Units in 2010 |
Energy Saved (PJ) 2010 |
Energy carrier saved |
| Tillage Coke Oven Gas for Hwange Efficient Boilers Savings in industry Prepayment Meters Geyser Timeswitch Efficient motors |
-1049.6 -104.8 -23.0 -14.0 -83.3 -147.9 -86.9 |
1 15 mill 100 200 1000 |
tractor litres diesel tonnes/hr steam units units kW |
1227 1 635 3000 61000 14000 |
.31 .59 6.95 .06 .82 .64 |
diesel diesel coal various elec-coal elec-coal elec-coal |
The energy saved in 2010 is an indication of the penetration to be achieved by the
efforts at that time. This information was based on the knowledge of the economy and the
potential for energy conservation. Some of the projects like the Coke Oven Gas option are
being implemented by industry for economic purposes.

The above graph shows potential savings of 69.6 PJ in 2010 and 178 PJ in 2030,
representing respectively, 15% and 24% of total demand. These are significant amounts of
savings for industry and they should generate sufficient interest from government and
industry especially when it is considered that the conservation options will benefit the
economy as well. The following is a description of some of the options for energy savings.
The option of using coke oven gas for Hwange power station has been accepted and is
being implemented by the Wankie Colliery Company and ZESA to reduce the consumption of
Diesel fuel. The option is being implemented not as an environmental protection measure
but as a cost cutting measure for the WCC, ZESA and the government.
Zimbabwean industries rely on the locally produced boilers for process steam raising.
The boilers are made under license and 70% of the market is supplied by a single
manufacturer. The manufacturer designs boilers to an efficiency of 74%. This level of
performance can be achieved through correct operation of the boiler including fuel
quality, water quality, fuel air mixture and boiler maintenance. In some companies the
following areas where improvements can be achieved have been identified:
steam blowers are not used regularly,
the air/fuel mixture is not monitored,
water treatment is not employed,
fuel quality fluctuates and boiler controls are not checked frequently.
The resultant efficiency of the boilers was therefore estimated at 50% on the average.
The study assumed that the boilers could be redesigned to an efficiency of 79% as opposed
to the current 74% and operation procedures could also be improved. No measures are
initiated for implementation of the option.
The Zimbabwean industry also relies on locally produced electric motors. Before the
recent liberalization of the economy, foreign exchange controls and the closed economy
allowed the manufacturer to concentrate in meeting the demand without improvements in
motor quality. In fact limitations in foreign exchange availability encouraged the use of
low quality laminations and windings. The motors are generally very bulky in proportion to
the horsepower ratings, and the manufacturer also does not have a test facility for
efficiency measurements. The study assumed that industrial motor efficiencies could be
improved by 15% on the average by redesigning the motors. However, high efficiency motors
are not available in Zimbabwe or Southern Africa.
The SADC Industrial Energy Conservation Pilot Project was implemented under CIDA
funding by a Canadian consultant with three SADC counterpart staff. The project was
carried out in four SADC countries namely Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana and Malawi. The
project tasks included training in energy auditing, building awareness, and assessment of
the energy conservation potential in the region. The key criteria for selection of
companies was that they had to be small to medium manufacturing plants. This gives an
indication of the capacity to invest and the availability of technical expertise to
implement energy efficiency projects.
The project was implemented through surveys of industry which were fully funded by
CIDA. The surveys analyzed energy use in general and produced some estimates of energy
conservation potentials in industry. The conservation options were categorised as no-cost,
low cost and medium cost and high cost. No cost measures included improved house keeping
and equipment repair. Even though repair and maintenance cost money it was assumed that
these measures are included in the normal operation and maintenance costs of the plant and
should be implemented anyway. Low cost and medium cost measures included retrofits such as
boiler efficiency improvement equipment or instrumentation, condensate reclamation, steam
pipe insulation and coordination of steam usage. The investment in low cost measures would
mostly cover labour costs.
High cost measures included the installation of new plant and equipment which would add
to the value of the plant such as heat exchangers, pumps, light fittings and process
equipment.
The SADC project did not classify the options as negative cost or positive cost.
However the criteria of simple payback (SPB) gives an indication that an investment will
payback within its lifetime. The options had their simple payback calculated to indicate
financial viability. Table 4.2 below shows the results of the SADC studies and the
potentials for conservation in energy and financial terms. The options include reduction
of thermal losses, process efficiency and lighting retrofits. Apart from establishing
potential conservation options the project compared energy intensity in industry to best
industry practice in other countries.
Table 4.2. Conservation options identified by the SADC Pilot Project
| Typical energy conservation measure | Frequency | Savings | Cost saved | Installation | SPB |
| GJ/Yr | US$/Yrljr | US$ | Yr | ||
| Improved combustion efficiency Repair steam traps Switch off lights Repair steam leaks De-energize transformer Repair compressed air leaks Refrigeration improvements Demand control Fuel conversion Power factor correction Reclaim condensate Insulate boilers/kilns/furnaces Flash steam recovery Insulate steam piping Process/operations revision Insulate process piping/equipment Air curtains Waste heat recovery Insulated condensate piping Indoor lighting retrofit Outdoor lighting retrofit |
9 16 42 18 1 6 1 1 6 14 17 18 6 24 29 25 6 14 12 9 17 |
234770 142784 15411 133667 3784 1881 1287 0 0 0 78491 36017 25329 140321 154922 6915 4158 266667 24771 4799 4984 |
252831 134826 132029 126840 20661 11525 6369 3455 150186 265602 94402 39961 24798 117906 239921 14677 10020 832968 18139 27056 38425 |
62245 172531 62760 28608 17959 102479 212671 16723 12061 1141166 33782 59544 98744 |
0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.6 |
| Total | 291 | 1280958 | 2562597 | 2021273 | 0.8 |
The Zimbabwe Energy Efficiency Project was commissioned by government (Ministry of Transport and Energy) to address the issues of energy efficiency in the economy. The first phase of the project was meant to identify potential options for conservation that can lead to viable investments in energy conservation. The project was being done with a background of rising electricity tariffs and shortage of electrical energy capacity in the system. The project was funded through the International Energy Initiative (IEI) by the Rockefeller Foundation. The project is meant to continue beyond 1996 when various physical projects may be implemented as part of the National Development Programme. The major players identified for the project were the utility (ZESA), the Department of Energy in the Ministry of Transport and Energy and private consultants. Utility participation has been limited to the review of reports and sporadic participation at some of the project meetings. It has not yet been established why the utility participation is so limited. Perceived benefits from the project are generally agreed to be reduction in expenditure on investments for energy and reduced utilisation